1: The Exhibition
1. What is the title of the exhibit? Blistering Vision:
Charles E. Burchfield’s Sublime American Landscapes
2. What is the theme of the exhibition? The theme involves
Burchfield’s love of nature and desire to present it to the public and the
tension between nature and our rapidly industrializing society
2: The Gallery
1. What type of lighting is used? In general softer, ceiling
track lighting is used throughout and focused on the particular works. In some
spaces the room lighting is more subdued and the lighting on the works is
brighter, more noticeable.
2. What colors are used on the walls? The large East Gallery
is painted off white; the smaller galleries are light gray.
3. What materials are used in the interior architecture of
the space? Interior materials are generally painted plaster board, with some
light gray stone outlining the entrance to the Burchfield Rotunda. It is
sparsely furnished with a few benches. The benches in the rotunda are arranged
in a circle to reinforce the circular space.
4. How is the movement of the viewer through the gallery
space? The large opening of the Oishei gallery to the left of the entrance
gallery draws the viewer in and directs them in a circle: past the replica of
Burchfield’s studio to the rotunda, through the rotunda into the East Gallery,
out the back of the East gallery where one can choose to go up the staircase to
sculpture exhibits or through a series of smaller galleries, and then back to
the entrance gallery
3: The Artwork
1. How are the artworks organized? They are arranged in a
variety of different way. Some spaces tend to alternate monochromatic
pieces/studies (usually smaller) with more brightly colored pieces (usually
larger). Some are arranged around a theme, such as one space dedicated to mines
and another dedicated to commissioned work for Fortune magazine. Where
available, studies are arranged next to finished works
2. How are the artworks similar? The paintings are almost
all watercolors; the studies and monochromatic works are almost all done with
conte crayon. None of the works address the human figure; I saw no animals
depicted other than birds. All the works either address natural phenomena or
man-made/industrial objects.
3. How are the artworks different? Many of the works are dark
or monochromatic – a lot of black and shades of gray, browns and tans – and
focus on industrial subjects. Others have vibrant colors and deal with nature
subjects.
4. How are the artworks framed? I’m assuming you literally
mean the frames on the works. Some, especially the smaller, monochromatic and
“darker” works, are in plain, black, and wooden. The larger works are in frames
that are lighter in color and somewhat more ornate.
5. How are the artworks identified and labeled? Each artwork
was labeled with Mr. Burchfield’s name, the name of the work (if any), date(s)
created, medium, place that owns it. Some also had a description of the work.
6. What is the proximity of the artwork to each other?
Generally 3-4 feet apart.
4: Art Criticism Exercise
Select three of the artworks from the show and use the Art
Criticism worksheet to describe, analyze, bracket and interpret the work using
the 5-step Art Criticism Process described. (see the sheet in the module
folder)
A.
Still Life: Scrap Iron (1929)
1.
Description: The work looks like a section of a
junk yard, with various pieces of scrap iron as the title notes. The pieces are
pushed against a decrepit fence, under telephone poles and wires at the right.
A few sparse blades of grass poke through at the lower right.
2.
Formal analysis: Various forms are created
through values – cylinders, domes, bowls – positioned largely at the center and
left of the work. This is balanced by the fence and telephone poles on the
right. The viewer’s eyes move from left to right and then upwards up the fence
and telephone poles at the right.
3.
Bracketing: This is a play on the still lives
more commonly seen in art: ones with flowers and fruit and tableware that have
been carefully arranged. Here we see the random arrangement of scrap metal in a
junk yard.
4.
Interpretation: I think the artist was trying to
show that even these discarded pieces are worthy of examination. Additionally,
even in this desolate landscape, nature (in the blades of grass) is still able
to survive.
B.
White Violets and Abandoned Coal Mine
1.
Description: In this work, the gaping mouth of
the opening of the mine takes up the center of the picture. A scrawny tree limb
appears to reach out from the right side of the opening and form a canopy over
it. Three white violets line the center and right of the opening.
2.
Formal analysis: The jagged lines of the branch
reach out from the mouth of the mine opening and white lines dangle down from
the branch, directing your attention towards the mouth of the mine. It gives an
ominous appearance to the mine opening, along with the claw-like appearance of
the branch. These contrast with the delicate appearance of the white violets.
3.
Bracketing: As noted above, the claw-like branch
reaching out of the mine opening and the
gaping mouth of the opening itself remind one of a monster, threatening the
delicate violets at the bottom of the opening.
4.
Interpretation: The artist may have been
commenting on the destruction of the natural world by the conduct of mining
operations, or at least how they threaten to damage nature. The presence of the
violets could also symbolize the resilience of nature in the face of
destructive side effects of industrialization
C.
Gothic Windows
1.
Description: In this work, tree branches form a
canopy over some smaller trees, framing them like window frames in a cathedral.
2.
Formal analysis: Much of the work is a series of
thin and thick lines – thick for the large tree trunks and branches, thin lines
for the smaller tree trunks and branches. It has an almost child-like
appearance. The composition is symmetrical. The floor of the forest is blue
instead of green, and dabs of light green at the ends of the smaller tree
branches represent leaves.
3.
Bracketing: As the name implies, the composition
evokes a cathedral.
4.
Interpretation: Burchfield saw nature as a
sacred space. He used this image of trees forming gothic windows in other
paintings as well- See below for Untitled (Gothic Window Trees) and the central
image in the Four Seasons.
No comments:
Post a Comment